Compliance Concerns: Issues Every AP Department Must Monitor

Notice: No webinar is currently available in this series.

This webinar is not currently available, new dates coming soon.

Frequently Asked Questions

Accounts payable departments face a broad range of compliance obligations that span tax reporting, fraud prevention, payment controls, and vendor management. One of the highest-priority areas is Form 1099 compliance—correctly identifying which vendors require 1099 reporting, collecting W-9 information proactively, and filing accurate 1099s by IRS deadlines to avoid penalties. Sales and use tax compliance is another significant risk area, particularly for companies operating in multiple states, where failure to self-assess use tax on purchases from out-of-state vendors can trigger audit assessments. Unclaimed property (escheatment) compliance requires AP departments to track and report outstanding checks and other unclaimed liabilities to state authorities on an annual basis. Fraud prevention controls—including segregation of duties, duplicate payment detection, and vendor master management—protect against both external fraud and internal misappropriation. IRS backup withholding requirements also impose compliance obligations when vendors fail to provide valid TINs. Additionally, SOX compliance requirements for public companies govern AP's internal controls over financial reporting. Aurora Training Advantage's AP compliance webinar provides a comprehensive review of these obligations and best practices for monitoring compliance proactively.
Duplicate payments and payment fraud represent two of the most costly and preventable losses in accounts payable operations. Preventing duplicates requires a combination of system controls and process discipline: AP systems should flag invoices with identical vendor numbers, amounts, and invoice dates before processing. Establishing a clear three-way match requirement—matching the purchase order, receiving report, and invoice before payment—catches errors and unauthorized invoices at the point of processing rather than after payment. Vendor master file controls are equally important: maintaining accurate, deduplicated vendor records with verified banking information prevents fraudulent vendor creation and misdirected payments. Segregation of duties—separating the functions of vendor setup, invoice approval, and payment execution among different personnel—creates internal checks that reduce both accidental errors and intentional fraud. Regular audits of the vendor master file, periodic ACH positive pay reviews, and robust controls around changes to vendor payment information (especially banking details) are essential defenses against business email compromise (BEC) fraud, which specifically targets AP departments. Aurora Training Advantage's AP compliance webinar covers these controls as part of a comprehensive compliance framework for accounts payable professionals.
Form 1099 compliance is one of the most complex and high-risk areas for accounts payable departments, with significant penalties for non-compliance. AP departments must collect Form W-9 from all vendors before making payments to determine whether the vendor is subject to 1099 reporting. Key 1099 series used by AP include Form 1099-NEC (for non-employee compensation of $600 or more paid to unincorporated vendors for services), Form 1099-MISC (for rents, royalties, attorney payments, and other miscellaneous income), and Form 1099-INT (for interest payments). Corporations are generally exempt from 1099 reporting except for certain attorney payments and medical services. Deadlines are critical: 1099-NEC must be filed with the IRS and furnished to recipients by January 31; most 1099-MISC forms are due February 28 (paper) or March 31 (electronic). Penalties for late or incorrect filing range from $60 to $640 per form depending on lateness and whether the failure was intentional. AP departments must also manage backup withholding—withholding 24% of payments when a valid TIN is not provided. Aurora Training Advantage's AP compliance webinar covers the full 1099 compliance workflow for AP professionals.
Unclaimed property (escheatment) laws require companies to report and remit to state governments certain types of financial property that have remained unclaimed by the rightful owner for a specified dormancy period—typically 1-5 years depending on the state and property type. For accounts payable, the most common unclaimed property issues arise from outstanding (uncleared) checks issued to vendors or employees that have never been cashed, overpayments that have not been refunded, and credit balances on vendor accounts. Many AP departments are unaware that failing to cash a check does not eliminate the liability—instead, the obligation transfers to the state when the dormancy period expires. Annual compliance requires identifying outstanding items by state, tracking dormancy periods, due-diligence notification to owners (usually a written notice at a specified threshold), and filing annual unclaimed property reports with each applicable state. Penalties for non-compliance can include significant interest and fines, and many states conduct aggressive unclaimed property audits. Establishing an annual AP process to identify and report unclaimed items is essential for compliance. Aurora Training Advantage's AP compliance webinar covers escheatment obligations and best practices for accounts payable departments.
Use tax is a self-assessed tax owed on taxable purchases made from vendors who did not collect sales tax—most commonly out-of-state vendors and certain online purchases. For accounts payable departments, use tax compliance requires a process for identifying taxable purchases on which no sales tax was charged, determining the applicable state and local use tax rates based on where the goods or services are used, self-assessing and remitting the tax to the appropriate taxing authorities on the company's sales/use tax return, and maintaining documentation to support the tax calculation and payment. The economic nexus standards established by the Supreme Court's 2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair decision have increased the number of vendors now collecting and remitting sales tax, reducing (but not eliminating) use tax exposure for buyers. However, AP departments in multi-state operations still face significant use tax complexity due to varying taxability rules, exemption certificate management, and state-specific filing requirements. The consequences of use tax non-compliance—audit assessments with interest and penalties going back 3-7 years—can be substantial. Aurora Training Advantage's AP compliance webinar provides guidance for establishing effective use tax monitoring and self-assessment processes within the AP function.