Beyond the Curve: Avoiding COVID-19 Litigation in the Workplace

Notice: No webinar is currently available in this series.

This webinar is not currently available, new dates coming soon.

Frequently Asked Questions

Employers can significantly reduce COVID-19 litigation risk by establishing clear, consistently applied workplace policies grounded in current public health guidance and federal, state, and local regulations. Documentation is paramount: employers should maintain written records of all COVID-related policies, safety measures implemented, accommodation requests, and the decisions made in response to them. Consistent application of policies across similarly situated employees is critical to defending against discrimination claims. Employers must engage in the interactive process when employees request accommodations related to COVID health risks, documenting each step thoroughly. Return-to-work protocols should address testing, vaccination policies, remote work eligibility, and leave entitlements under applicable laws such as the FMLA and ADA. Proactive communication through regular workplace updates and manager training reduces misunderstandings that often trigger claims. HR professionals who stay current on evolving legal standards are best positioned to guide their organizations safely through ongoing pandemic-related legal challenges.
Effective pandemic-related legal protection starts with a comprehensive written policy framework that addresses communicable disease response, remote work arrangements, vaccination and testing requirements, and leave entitlements. Policies should be reviewed by employment counsel to ensure alignment with ADA, FMLA, Title VII, OSHA requirements, and applicable state laws. A clear accommodation request process—including how employees can raise health concerns and how managers should respond—reduces exposure to disability and religious discrimination claims. Flexible leave policies that account for employees affected by illness, caregiving obligations, or medical vulnerability demonstrate good faith and reduce the risk of retaliation claims. Policies should be communicated clearly in writing, made accessible to all employees, and enforced uniformly. Regular policy audits as legal standards evolve ensure organizations do not operate under outdated guidance. HR leaders should also train managers to recognize when situations require escalation to HR or legal counsel.
Employers have overlapping legal obligations related to COVID-19 under several federal and state frameworks. Under OSHA's General Duty Clause, employers must provide a workplace free from recognized hazards, which includes implementing reasonable COVID-19 safety protocols. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees whose underlying health conditions make them particularly vulnerable to COVID-19, unless doing so creates an undue hardship. Title VII religious discrimination provisions similarly require employers to consider accommodations for employees with sincerely held religious objections to vaccination mandates. The Family and Medical Leave Act entitles eligible employees to unpaid leave for their own serious health condition or to care for a covered family member. State workers' compensation laws may apply to employees who contract COVID-19 in the course of employment. HR professionals must understand how these obligations interact and maintain documentation demonstrating compliance with each applicable legal standard.
When employees refuse to return to the workplace citing COVID-19 concerns, HR should begin with a good-faith, documented conversation to understand the specific nature of their concerns. If the refusal is connected to an underlying health condition, HR must initiate the ADA interactive process to explore whether a reasonable accommodation—such as continued remote work, schedule modification, or a temporary leave—is available. If the objection is rooted in religious beliefs regarding vaccination requirements, a similar accommodation analysis under Title VII applies. For employees whose concerns are general rather than legally protected, HR should communicate the specific safety measures in place and offer factual information to address concerns. If no accommodation is required and the employee continues to refuse a reasonable return-to-work directive, the employer may take appropriate disciplinary action, provided it has followed its own written policies consistently. Thorough documentation throughout the process is essential for defending any subsequent claims.
HR professionals and people managers need targeted training across several intersecting areas to effectively manage ongoing COVID-19 legal risk. Training on ADA accommodation obligations—specifically how to recognize accommodation requests, conduct the interactive process, and document decisions—is foundational, as disability-related claims remain one of the most common litigation categories tied to COVID-19. FMLA leave administration training ensures managers handle medical leave requests correctly and avoid interference or retaliation claims. Retaliation prevention training helps supervisors avoid actions that could be perceived as punishing employees who raised safety concerns or requested accommodations. Anti-discrimination training addressing consistent policy application prevents disparate treatment claims. For employers with vaccination or testing policies, training on religious and medical exemption handling is essential. Continuing education programs that update HR teams as OSHA guidance, court decisions, and state laws evolve provide the current knowledge needed to keep workplace practices legally defensible in a rapidly changing environment.