Strategies for Dealing with FMLA Abuse

Next session to be announced. New dates for this series appear here as soon as they're scheduled.

Past Sessions in This Series

  • 4.4 out of 5 from 82 survey responses
  • 1,000+ professionals attended
  1. Strategies for Dealing with FMLA Abuse

    Presented 12 times · 2016–2024

    Speaker: Susan Desmond

    Show all dates

    · · · · · · · · · · ·

What Attendees Said

  • The training was wonderful, I really liked that actual past cases were used to drive points and show examples. I really enjoyed the pace of the presentation as well.

    Allison C.
  • Training gave me great ideas to present to the company to help with FMLA abuse.

    Jacqueline W.
  • I would like to hear more about ADA and FMLA as it relates to mental health and what is typical being approved

    Penny H.
  • This was one of the best trainings I have taken on FMLA. I am glad that you designed a training on how to recognize FMLA abuse and had an attorney present the information. I related to some of the cases presented.

    Lisa C.
  • This is my 5th class with Aurora. I'm pleased that I can stay current right from my desk. The content is relevant and the presenters are knowledgeable. If you are looking to stay current or learn more about HR, I recommend using the Membership training. The price is very affordable when you break it down to a "per class" price.

    Christina E.
  • Very informative and am very grateful to the presenter for being so thorough!

    Lori Jane D.

This webinar is not currently available, new dates coming soon.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is FMLA abuse and how can employers identify potential patterns?
FMLA abuse occurs when employees misuse rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act by taking protected leave for non-qualifying purposes or misrepresenting qualifying conditions to secure leave they are not entitled to. Common patterns include intermittent leave suspiciously clustered around weekends, holidays, or desirable schedule periods; absences correlated with denied vacation requests; and medical certifications that are vague, contradictory, or inconsistent with observed employee behavior. Identifying potential FMLA abuse requires careful documented tracking of leave patterns without making assumptions about any individual case — since many patterns that appear suspicious may have legitimate medical explanations. Employers who suspect abuse must proceed cautiously to avoid interfering with genuine FMLA rights while still protecting legitimate business interests. Documentation and consistency are essential throughout any investigation process.
What steps can employers take to address FMLA abuse without violating the law?
Addressing potential FMLA abuse requires a careful, legally compliant approach that protects genuine leave rights while deterring misuse. Employers have the right to require complete and sufficient medical certifications and to obtain second or third opinions at their own expense when a certification is unclear. If an employee's conduct while on leave is inconsistent with their certified condition — such as working another job while claiming total incapacity — employers may investigate and potentially take action based on documented evidence of misrepresentation. Uniformly applied attendance policies that do not conflict with FMLA rights remain enforceable for non-FMLA absences. All actions taken in response to suspected FMLA abuse must be carefully documented, applied consistently across similarly situated employees, and reviewed by employment counsel before implementation to avoid triggering retaliation or interference claims.
How should employers manage intermittent FMLA leave to minimize operational disruption?
Intermittent FMLA leave — taken in separate blocks of time for a single qualifying condition — is among the most administratively challenging aspects of the FMLA. Effective management begins with requiring medical certifications that specify the expected frequency and duration of leave episodes, establishing a baseline against which actual usage can be compared. Employers should designate all qualifying absences as FMLA leave in writing even when employees do not explicitly request it, ensuring the entitlement is drawn down appropriately. Tracking systems that log all intermittent absences by date, duration, and stated reason create the documentation foundation needed to identify unusual patterns. Requiring advance notice for foreseeable intermittent leave and notice as soon as practicable for unforeseen absences gives supervisors maximum planning opportunity. Cross-training and flexible staffing strategies reduce operational disruption from unpredictable absences.
What documentation best practices protect employers when managing FMLA compliance?
Thorough, contemporaneous documentation is the foundation of any employer's ability to manage FMLA effectively and address potential abuse defensibly. Best practices include maintaining a centralized FMLA tracking system that records all leave requests, certifications, designations, and absences with precise dates and durations. All communications with employees about FMLA — requests, designations, certification requirements, and any concerns about compliance — should be in writing with copies retained. When a certification appears incomplete or insufficient, the employer should provide written notice specifying the additional information required within the timeframes prescribed by FMLA regulations. If FMLA abuse is suspected, document specific observable facts — attendance patterns, dates, statements made — without characterizing intent or speculating about motivation. This factual documentation record is essential if the employer ultimately takes adverse action the employee challenges as FMLA retaliation.
Can employers discipline employees for FMLA abuse if they are taking legitimate leave?
This is one of the most nuanced questions in FMLA administration. Employers generally cannot discipline an employee for taking leave that is genuinely protected under the FMLA, even if the leave is frequently used or results in operational disruption. However, employers can act when they have documented evidence that an employee misrepresented a qualifying condition, falsified medical documentation, or engaged in conduct clearly inconsistent with their certified limitation. Employers may also enforce uniformly applied performance and conduct standards that apply equally to all employees regardless of FMLA status — for example, disciplining for pre-leave misconduct or terminating for legitimate business reasons unrelated to the leave. Any disciplinary action involving an FMLA-protected employee should be reviewed with employment counsel before implementation to ensure it does not constitute unlawful interference with FMLA rights or actionable retaliation.