Handling COVID-19 OSHA Complaints

Notice: No webinar is currently available in this series.

This webinar is not currently available, new dates coming soon.

Frequently Asked Questions

When OSHA receives a complaint alleging COVID-19 safety violations in a workplace, the agency's response depends on the complaint's severity, the industry, and the applicable standards in effect at the time. OSHA may conduct an inspection (either on-site or remotely via phone and fax) or send a letter requiring the employer to investigate and respond. Employers who receive an OSHA inquiry letter must respond in writing within the specified timeframe—typically within five business days—documenting the safety measures they have implemented. A thorough written response should describe current protocols, including ventilation practices, PPE availability, physical distancing measures, vaccination or testing policies, and employee training. If an OSHA inspector visits the workplace, employers have the right to accompany the inspector during the walkthrough but should not obstruct the investigation. Proactive documentation of all COVID-19-related safety policies and training records is the most effective preparation for any potential OSHA inquiry, regardless of whether a formal complaint has been filed.
Under OSHA's recordkeeping regulations (29 CFR Part 1904), employers covered by OSHA recordkeeping requirements must record COVID-19 cases as work-related illnesses when three conditions are met: (1) the case is a confirmed COVID-19 case as defined by the CDC, (2) the case is work-related—meaning an event or exposure in the work environment either caused or contributed to the COVID-19 case, or significantly aggravated a pre-existing illness—and (3) the case involves one or more of the general recording criteria (such as days away from work, restricted duty, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness). Employers are not required to record cases where the work-relatedness is not established or where there is no general recording criterion met. OSHA has acknowledged that determining work-relatedness for COVID-19 can be difficult given community spread, and employers are required to make reasonable determinations based on available information. Maintaining thorough records of workplace exposure incidents, employee notifications, and investigations supports accurate recordkeeping and defensibility in the event of an OSHA inquiry.
Yes—Section 11(c) of the OSH Act prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who exercise their rights under OSHA, including filing a safety complaint, refusing to perform work they reasonably believe poses imminent danger, or participating in an OSHA inspection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, retaliation complaints frequently arose from situations where employees raised COVID-19 safety concerns and subsequently faced adverse employment actions such as termination, demotion, reduced hours, or schedule changes. An employee has 30 days from the date of the alleged retaliation to file a complaint with OSHA. If OSHA finds merit in the complaint, it may require the employer to reinstate the employee, pay back wages, and remove adverse actions from the employment record. Employers must train managers not to retaliate—even informally—against employees who raise safety concerns, and should create a clear, accessible process for reporting workplace safety issues without fear of negative consequences. Documented, non-retaliatory business reasons for any adverse actions taken against employees who have raised complaints are essential.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, OSHA issued several standards and guidance documents to address workplace safety. The most significant was the COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for healthcare settings, which imposed specific requirements on hospitals, nursing homes, and other healthcare employers related to patient screening, PPE, physical distancing, cleaning, and employee vaccination or testing. A separate general industry ETS addressing vaccination-and-testing requirements for large employers was issued in 2021 but was blocked by the Supreme Court. For non-healthcare employers outside of an active ETS, OSHA's enforcement of COVID-19 hazards has primarily relied on the General Duty Clause, which requires employers to provide a workplace free from recognized serious hazards. OSHA has also issued extensive COVID-19 guidance documents covering ventilation, PPE, physical distancing, and case management that, while not mandatory standards, represent the agency's enforcement priorities. Employers in healthcare or other high-exposure industries should closely monitor OSHA for any updated COVID-19-specific standards applicable to their sector.
Preparation for a potential OSHA COVID-19 inspection begins long before any complaint is filed, through proactive documentation and policy maintenance. HR should maintain records of all COVID-19-related safety policies, training sessions, employee communications, hazard assessments, PPE procurement, and any workplace COVID-19 cases investigated for work-relatedness. When an OSHA inspector arrives (or an inquiry letter is received), employers should designate a single point of contact—typically HR or legal counsel—to coordinate the response. During a physical inspection, management may accompany the inspector on the walkaround. Employees have the right to speak with inspectors privately, and employers must not discourage or prevent this. After the inspection, OSHA may issue citations with proposed penalties. Employers have the right to contest citations through an informal conference with OSHA's area director or formal contest to the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. Engaging employment counsel with OSHA expertise early in the process significantly improves outcomes, and a settlement agreement at the informal conference stage often results in reduced penalties.