Best Practices for Working with Vendors and Suppliers

Access this expert-led webinar instantly, available anytime on-demand.

4.1
Included in All-Access Membership
Live Webinar - no upcoming date
Customer Satisfaction Guarantee Learn with confidence. If you're not happy, we'll make it right. That's our guarantee.

Purchase Options

Select an attendee quantity to add to cart.

Recorded Webinar Only

$219.00
or

All Access Membership

The Aurora All Access Membership is designed to provide you with the training that you want when you want it. You will have 100% access to every live webinar, on demand webinar, professional alert, and podcast that Aurora Training Advantage offers with no additional cost.

Learn More About Our All Access Membership
$599.00
All Access Membership

Building and maintaining strong vendor relationships is more than just a handshake deal — it's a critical part of ensuring organizational success and minimizing risk. This webinar will explore the foundational principles of managing vendor relationships with professionalism and foresight. Attendees will gain insights into viewing vendor relationships as business partnerships, with a clear understanding of the importance of representing their organization’s best interests above all else. Participants will learn how to establish firm boundaries that avoid personal entanglements and instead foster win-win relationships grounded in clear terms and mutual benefit.

The session will also provide detailed guidance on navigating the complexities of vendor agreements. From reviewing terms of sale, liability clauses, and indemnifications to ensuring proper insurance and certifications are in place, this webinar will help you build contracts that protect your agency or company. Real-world case studies will bring the content to life, showcasing both challenges and successful outcomes in vendor management. You’ll also learn how to monitor performance, provide fair solicitation opportunities, and ensure vendors deliver value — all while reducing risk and increasing service quality.

Topics Covered:
  • Professional boundaries in vendor relationships
  • Vendor agreement structuring and term review
  • Risk mitigation through insurance, licensing, and penalties
  • Monitoring performance and ensuring accountability
  • Case studies demonstrating real-world vendor challenges and solutions
Your Benefits For Attending:
  • Understand how to manage vendor relationships as business partnerships that protect your organization's interests.
  • Learn best practices for structuring vendor agreements to reduce liability and avoid unfavorable terms.
  • Discover how to monitor vendor performance to ensure quality service delivery and timely compliance.
  • Gain insight into common vendor pitfalls and how to address or avoid them.
  • Analyze real-life case studies that highlight both risks and successful strategies in vendor management.

This webinar will equip you with the tools to strengthen your organization's vendor relationships while minimizing risk and increasing efficiency. Attending will give you actionable strategies to elevate your role as a steward of your company or agency’s resources.

Who Should Attend:
Professionals involved in procurement, contract management, operations, finance, and organizational compliance who manage or influence vendor relationships.

Level: Beginners/Intermediate
Format: Live webcast
Instructional Method: Group: Internet-based
NASBA Field of Study: Management Services
Program Prerequisites: None
Advance Preparation: None

  1. Introduction 00:01:13
  2. A Business Relationship  - Things To Remember 0:02:37
  3. A Business Relationship - Who Is Your Vendor Representing And Protecting? 00:08:44
  4. A Business Relationship - Keeping The Relationship All Business 00:16:34
  5. A Business Relationship - Avoid Getting Into Personal Relationships 00:27:36
  6. A Business Relationship - Case Study 00:32:00
  7. Coming to Terms With Your Vendor - Terms And Conditions 00:34:01
  8. Coming to Terms With Your Vendor - Binding Agreements 00:41:43
  9. Coming to Terms With Your Vendor - Vendor Agreements 00:51:31
  10. Coming to Terms With Your Vendor - When You Must Use A Vendors Contract 00:57:04
  11. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Require Insurance 01:04:16
  12. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Specialized Insurance 01:06:32
  13. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Certifications Or Licenses 01:09:29
  14. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Penalties 01:11:41
  15. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Require Bonds 01:15:49
  16. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Exit Clauses 01:16:41
  17. Limit The Risk To Your Organization - Vendor Responsibility Check 01:23:24
  18. How To Increase The Quality Of Your Business Relationship With Vendors - Products And Services 01:26:11
  19. How To Increase The Quality Of Your Business Relationship With Vendors - Competitive Soliciations 01:29:20
  20. How To Increase The Quality Of Your Business Relationship With Vendors - Monitor Performance 01:31:34
  21. How To Increase The Quality Of Your Business Relationship With Vendors - Payment Terms 01:33:11
  22. Case Studies - High Risk Liability 01:35:15
  23. Case Studies - Quality Transportation Services 01:36:11
  24. Case Studies - Quality Transportation Services Continued 01:36:57
  25. Case Studies - Quality Transportation Services Continued 01:37:31
  26. Case Studies - Protesting Loss Of Business 01:38:08
  27. Case Studies - Monitoring Supply Vendor Leads 01:40:12
  28. Case Studies - Monitoring Supply Vendor Leads Continued 01:41:21
  29. Case Studies - Poor Results 01:41:48
  30. Question & Answers Period 01:42:36
  31. Presentation Closing 01:46:15
  • Kenneth Jones

CPE Credit

Continuing Professional Education

Aurora Training Advantage is registered with the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors. State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE Sponsors through its website: www.nasbaregistry.org.

For more information regarding administrative policies such as complaint and refund, and cancellation please contact our offices at 407-542-4317 or [email protected].

You must answer all questions during the webinar, view the recording completely and pass the test at the end with 70% correct answers to receive CPE credit.

ISM Credit

Institute of Supply Management

This program may be used for Continuing Education Hours (CEH) toward recertification for programs offered by the Institute for Supply Management®, including the Certified Professional in Supply Management® and Certified Professional in Supplier Diversity®.

QPANJ Credit

Qualified Purchasing Agent - New Jersey

ATAPU Credit

Aurora Training Advantage is offering continuing education points designed to recognize dedication to training and excellence in purchasing.
  • Arbitration 00:42:42, 00:42:55, 1:00:04
  • Bid 00:08:12, 00:13:34, 00:35:53
  • Bid Bond 01:15:55
  • Commodity 00.09:39, 00:10:40, 00:45:54, 00:46:12
  • Contract 00:04:45, 00:06:44, 00:06:49, 00:08:10, 00:43:41, 00:44:02, 00:49:20
  • Debriefing 00:48:49, 00:49:10, 00:49:17, 00:49:47, 00:49:56, 00:50:09
  • Force Majeure 1:02:04, 1:03:07
  • Indemnification 1:00:05, 1:00:08
  • Labor and Materials Bond 01:15:55
  • Liability 00:59:29, 00:59:50, 01:06:39
  • Procurement 00:01:35, 00:01:41, 00:03:07, 00:08:24, 00:08:32, 00:08:47, 00:09:48, 00:38:12, 00:44:12, 01:23:20
  • Request For Quotation 00:42:24,00:46:58
  • Requisition 00:46:14
  • Scoring Matrix 00:49:39
  • Vendor 00:02:46, 00:03:09, 00:05:00, 00:08:13, 00:36:15, 00:37:41, 00:42:53

Bid: A bid is an offer made by an investor, trader, or dealer in an effort to buy an asset or to compete for a contract.

Commodity: A basic good used in commerce that is interchangeable with other goods of the same type.

Contract: A written or spoken agreement, especially one concerning employment, sales, or tenancy, that is intended to be enforceable by law.

Contractor: A person or company that undertakes a contract to provide materials or labor to perform a service or do a job.

Procurement: Procurement is the process of finding and agreeing to terms, and acquiring goods, services, or works from an external source, often via a tendering or competitive bidding process. Procurement is used to ensure the buyer receives goods, services, or works at the best possible price when aspects such as quality, quantity, time, and location are compared.

Request For Information (RFI): A request for information is a common business process whose purpose is to collect written information about the capabilities of various suppliers. Normally it follows a format that can be used for comparative purposes. An RFI is primarily used to gather information to help make a decision on what steps to take next.

Request for Proposal (RFP): A request for proposal (RFP) is a document that solicits proposal, often made through a bidding process, by an agency or company interested in procurement of a commodity, service, or valuable asset, to potential suppliers to submit business proposals.

Scope of Work (SOW): The Scope of Work (SOW) is the area in an agreement where the work to be performed is described. The SOW should contain any milestones, reports, deliverables, and end products that are expected to be provided by the performing party. The SOW should also contain a time line for all deliverables.

Scoring Matrix: A tool that helps you evaluate multiple options based on a set of criteria.

Subcontractor: The process by which these various specialist trades are brought into a project.

Vendor: A vendor is a person or business that supplies goods or services to a company. Another term for the vendor is the supplier. In many situations, a company presents the vendor with a purchase order stating the goods or services needed, the price, delivery date, and other terms.

Vendor Database: The Vendor database stores information about your vendors. Because the system is fully integrated, the information you enter in the Vendor database is automatically supplied to other parts of the system.

Z-Score: The Z-score formula for predicting bankruptcy was published in 1968 by Edward I. Altman, who was, at the time, an Assistant Professor of Finance at New York University. The formula may be used to predict the probability that a firm will go into bankruptcy within two years.


Customer Satisfaction Guarantee
Invest in your future with confidence! Our Customer Satisfaction Guarantee eliminates all risk, letting you focus purely on mastering new skills and advancing your career. If you're not completely satisfied, we'll ensure you are. Your satisfaction is not just a promise; it's our guarantee.

Webinar Survey Overall Rating

This webinar received a total of 3 survey responses. Attendees have given an average rating of 4.1 stars out of a possible 5, reflecting the quality and value of the content presented.

Average rating

4.1 / 5
Webinar Presentation
How many of the objectives of the event were met?
4.7 Stars
How useful was the information presented at this event?
3.7 Stars
Overall, how satisfied were you with this event?
3.7 Stars
Speaker Performance
Overall, how satisfied were you with this presenter?
4.3 Stars
How closely did the presenter follow the schedule?
4.3 Stars

Reviews From Webinar Survey

Our webinars are crafted to deliver exceptional value and insight to business professionals. Below, you'll find genuine feedback from attendees.

Taylor C.
October 22, 2025
4.2 / 5
Webinar Rating:
4.0 Stars
Speaker Rating:
4.5 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
Would love an advanced version of this training.

Alex S.
October 21, 2025
3.8 / 5
Webinar Rating:
3.7 Stars
Speaker Rating:
4.0 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Kimberly M.
October 21, 2025
4.4 / 5
Webinar Rating:
4.3 Stars
Speaker Rating:
4.5 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
Very informative

Frequently Asked Questions

Effective vendor relationship management treats suppliers as business partners while maintaining clear organizational boundaries that protect against conflicts of interest, liability, and dependency risks. The foundational principle is that vendor relationships must serve the organization's interests first—purchasing decisions should be driven by quality, value, and reliability, not personal relationships or favoritism. Establishing formal vendor agreements with clearly defined terms—scope of work, pricing, delivery standards, liability limitations, insurance requirements, and performance metrics—transforms informal understandings into enforceable obligations. Organizations should also require vendors to maintain appropriate insurance coverage (general liability, workers' compensation, professional liability where applicable) and verify certificates annually rather than at contract inception only. Avoiding personal entanglements with vendor representatives—social relationships that could compromise objective evaluation—protects the purchasing professional's credibility and the organization's integrity. Kenneth Jones covers vendor relationship fundamentals with real-world case studies in Aurora Training Advantage's vendor management webinar, drawing on over 30 years of public and non-profit procurement experience.
Vendor-supplied contracts and terms of sale are written to protect the vendor's interests—not the buyer's—making careful review before signing essential. Key provisions to scrutinize include: liability and indemnification clauses (vendors often try to cap their liability or shift it entirely to the buyer); insurance requirements and whether they are sufficient for the risk associated with the engagement; dispute resolution mechanisms (arbitration clauses can limit the buyer's legal remedies); unilateral termination and price change rights (vendors sometimes include the ability to change prices or terminate with minimal notice); intellectual property ownership provisions for custom deliverables; and force majeure clauses that define what events excuse non-performance. Exit clauses deserve special attention—organizations should negotiate the ability to terminate agreements for convenience with reasonable notice rather than being locked in indefinitely. When using a vendor's standard contract is unavoidable, adding an addendum or rider that modifies unfavorable terms is often more effective than redlining the vendor's document, which can stall negotiations. Organizations with significant procurement volume should have standard approved contract templates that position the buyer favorably, rather than routinely accepting vendor-drafted terms.
Vendor performance monitoring is what separates organizations that consistently receive contracted value from those that accept deteriorating service because changing vendors feels costly or disruptive. Effective monitoring begins at contract execution: clear, measurable performance standards (delivery timeframes, quality thresholds, response time requirements, error rates) must be defined before the contract is signed, not after problems arise. Regular performance reviews—whether monthly, quarterly, or annually depending on contract value and risk—create structured opportunities to review metrics against standards and address gaps formally. Maintaining a contemporaneous record of performance issues—dates, descriptions, communications, and resolution timelines—provides the documentation needed to enforce contract remedies if performance fails to improve. Scoring matrices that weight multiple performance dimensions (cost, quality, timeliness, responsiveness) provide objective comparative data for vendor ranking and competitive solicitation decisions. Performance data also enables strategic conversations with vendors about improvement investments—suppliers who understand they are being measured and compared are more motivated to invest in service quality. Aurora Training Advantage's vendor management webinar covers performance monitoring frameworks applicable across vendor categories and contract types.
Vendor relationships introduce several categories of risk that procurement professionals must proactively manage. Financial risk—the possibility that a vendor fails, merges, or changes ownership—can disrupt supply chains and leave the organization without contracted services. Mitigations include requiring vendors to maintain bonds, monitoring financial health indicators for strategic suppliers, and maintaining backup supplier relationships for critical categories. Liability risk from vendor activities on organizational premises or involving organizational assets requires adequate insurance certificates with the buyer named as additional insured. Quality and compliance risks—vendors delivering substandard goods or failing regulatory requirements—are managed through contractual quality standards, audit rights, and penalties for non-conformance. Data security risk arises when vendors access organizational systems or data, requiring vendors to meet information security standards and execute appropriate data processing agreements. Concentration risk occurs when a single vendor represents too large a share of an organization's supply for a critical category—diversification strategies reduce single points of failure. Conducting vendor responsibility checks before awarding contracts—verifying licenses, certifications, and absence of debarment—prevents awarding business to vendors who cannot legally or competently perform.
Fair competitive solicitation is both an ethical obligation and a strategic tool for obtaining best value—and in public sector organizations, it is also a legal requirement. Providing all competing vendors with identical information, the same access to organizational representatives for questions, and equal opportunity to propose solutions ensures that the competitive process produces valid, comparable bids. Issuing formal Requests for Proposals (RFPs) or Requests for Quotations (RFQs) with clear specifications, evaluation criteria, and selection procedures removes subjectivity from the process and provides all bidders with a level playing field. Using a structured scoring matrix to evaluate proposals against pre-defined criteria—rather than selecting based on relationships or intuition—produces defensible decisions and identifies the vendor offering the best overall strategic value, not just the lowest price. Providing debriefs to unsuccessful bidders is a best practice that improves vendor relationships, supports market development, and demonstrates that the process was conducted fairly. Rotating vendors on the competitive solicitation list—rather than exclusively re-soliciting incumbent relationships—ensures the organization continuously validates that current suppliers remain best-in-class and that new competitors have opportunities to earn business.