Realizing the Promise and Impact of 360 Assessments
Access this expert-led webinar instantly, available anytime on-demand.
Included in All-Access Membership Live Webinar
On-Demand Webinar Available
Customer Satisfaction Guarantee Learn with confidence. If you're not happy, we'll make it right. That's our guarantee.
The 360‐degree feedback (360) process, in which subordinates, peers, bosses and/or customers provide feedback, has become pervasive in management and human resource development. Some companies have successfully leveraged 360 feedback tools and processes to develop their leaders and broader talent, however, many companies have experienced frustration and challenges in realizing the potential and impact of their 360-assessment activities.
Fortunately, through our work with thousands of clients and research over the last 10-years, key learnings have emerged. There are common and consistent best practices, tips and key areas of consideration that can be applied to achieve the insights, feedback and systemic impact of a 360-feedback activity. When a company designs their 360-assessment program to include these practices, tips and areas of consideration they can realize the large scale and ongoing development that they desire.
If you are considering implementing or expanding a 360-assessment program, or want to improve the results you are achieving with your current 360-assessment program, this is a must attend webinar.
What we will cover:
- Key areas of resistance when implementing a 360-assessment program.
- Areas of risk to be managed when introducing or expanding 360-assessment.
- 5 key design elements of an effective 360-assessment program.
- Chose the right tool – mapping 360-assessment to your business and competency requirements.
- Off the shelf or customize – weighing cost vs. benefit of 360-tool options.
- Building momentum - 7 best practices when expanding the use 360-assessment program.
- Performance vs potential – optional tools and practices for different use scenarios.
-
Joe Frodsham
For over a decade, Joe led JBKF Group, consulting with companies across industries on issues of talent and careers. In 2014, Joe merged JBKF Group with Career Management Partners (CMP), a talent and transition firm focused on recruiting, development, career transition, and outplacement solutions. CM [...]
HRCI Credit
SHRM Credit
ATAHR Credit
Aurora Training Advantage is offering continuing education points designed to recognize dedication to training and excellence in human resources.
Invest in your future with confidence! Our Customer Satisfaction Guarantee eliminates all risk, letting you focus purely on mastering new skills and advancing your career. If you're not completely satisfied, we'll ensure you are. Your satisfaction is not just a promise; it's our guarantee.
This webinar received a total of 4 survey responses. Attendees have given an average rating of 4.0 stars out of a possible 5, reflecting the quality and value of the content presented.
Webinar Presentation
How many of the objectives of the event were met?
4.5 Stars
How useful was the information presented at this event?
4.3 Stars
Overall, how satisfied were you with this event?
3.3 Stars
Speaker Performance
Overall, how satisfied were you with this presenter?
3.3 Stars
How closely did the presenter follow the schedule?
4.5 Stars
Reviews From Webinar Survey
Our webinars are crafted to deliver exceptional value and insight to business professionals. Below, you'll find genuine feedback from attendees.
Michilyn M.
February 7, 2024
3.8 / 5
Webinar Rating:
3.7 Stars
Speaker Rating:
4.0 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
This was a good presentation but not much to learn. It did though, validate that we are doing things right.
Suzan G.
February 7, 2024
4.6 / 5
Webinar Rating:
4.7 Stars
Speaker Rating:
4.5 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
Loved this training. I am going to ask for a 360 assessment this year
Lucas T.
February 7, 2024
5.0 / 5
Webinar Rating:
5.0 Stars
Speaker Rating:
5.0 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment
Christie H.
February 7, 2024
2.4 / 5
Webinar Rating:
2.7 Stars
Speaker Rating:
2.0 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
Audio did not work. Never saw any communication or update about the issue. That was a distraction.
Frequently Asked Questions
360-degree feedback is a talent development tool in which an individual receives structured feedback from multiple sources — typically their direct reports, peers, manager, and sometimes customers — rather than only from their direct supervisor. This multi-rater approach provides a more comprehensive picture of a leader's effectiveness than single-source feedback, surfacing behavioral patterns and blind spots that are often invisible in the traditional top-down review. In leadership development, 360 assessments are used to identify specific strengths to leverage, development areas to address, and gaps between how leaders perceive themselves and how they are experienced by others. The most impactful 360 programs connect feedback to individual development plans, coaching conversations, and organizational competency frameworks, creating a structured pathway from insight to behavior change.
Effective 360-assessment programs share five key design elements that distinguish programs delivering real development impact from those generating data that sits unused. First, the assessment must be mapped to the organization's actual leadership competencies — generic tools produce generic insights that are difficult to connect to specific development action. Second, the rater selection process must be thoughtful: raters who know the individual's work well and represent meaningful perspectives produce more useful data than broad, random selections. Third, the feedback report must be designed for actionability — presenting data in a way that individuals can understand and use rather than overwhelming them with numbers. Fourth, the process must include structured support for interpreting results: manager conversations, HR guidance, or coaching. Fifth, there must be a mechanism for following up on development commitments over time, ensuring that 360 feedback drives lasting behavior change rather than one-time reflection.
Organizations most commonly undermine their 360 programs through predictable, avoidable mistakes. Using a generic off-the-shelf tool not aligned to the organization's actual competency model produces feedback that is hard to connect to specific development expectations or career frameworks. Failing to build psychological safety around the process — especially if there is fear that 360 data will be used for performance ratings rather than development — causes raters to inflate scores and reduces the quality of feedback. Not providing structured debrief support after reports are distributed leaves individuals to interpret complex, sometimes emotionally charged data alone, often leading to defensive reactions rather than development commitment. Launching a 360 program without sufficient communication about its purpose, process, and confidentiality protections generates anxiety and resistance. And failing to connect 360 insights to actual development plans and follow-up conversations means the investment produces insight but not change.
The question of whether to use 360 feedback for performance management versus development purposes is one of the most consequential design decisions in implementing a 360 program, with significant implications for data quality and participant trust. Using 360 data for performance ratings creates strong incentive for raters to inflate scores — particularly when their direct reports will be evaluated on the results — which corrupts the data quality that makes 360 feedback valuable. Research consistently shows that 360-assessment programs used exclusively for development (with explicit guarantees of confidentiality and no connection to compensation or ratings) produce more candid, useful, and actionable feedback. Best practice is to maintain strict separation between 360 development programs and formal performance evaluation processes. Organizations that need multi-source performance input should use a separate, clearly distinguished process with different tools and communication from the development-focused 360.
Building organizational momentum for 360-assessment programs requires a deliberate scaling strategy that starts with a successful pilot, generates visible positive outcomes, and uses those outcomes to build broader support. Starting with a cohort of senior leaders who are genuinely committed to development — rather than mandating broad rollout immediately — produces the visible behavior change and positive testimonials that make others want to participate. Communicating success stories from early participants builds credibility and reduces skepticism. Developing internal capability through HR practitioners and coaches who can facilitate quality debrief conversations reduces dependence on external consultants and makes the program scalable. Creating infrastructure — a consistent tool, a standardized rater selection process, a debrief protocol, and a development planning template — ensures that quality remains consistent as the program expands. Linking 360 participation to leadership development programs, succession planning, and career advancement conversations reinforces its organizational value over time.