Cheryl Pinarchick

Cheryl Pinarchick

Fisher Phillips

Human Resources Website Linkedin

Cheryl Pinarchick is a partner in the firm's Boston office and a founding Co-Chair of the Pay Equity Practice Group. She represents employers in all areas of employment law.

Cheryl has extensive trial experience in state and federal courts throughout the United States. She has successfully defended employment lawsuits alleging wrongful termination, employment discrimination, sexual and other forms of harassment, wage and hour violations, retaliation and other related claims. She has also successfully prosecuted trade secret and non-competition agreements in numerous jurisdictions.

Cheryl counsels employers on compliance with the law in areas such as pay equity, employment discrimination, wrongful termination, reductions in force, FMLA and leave laws, sexual harassment, and wage & hour matters, including issues related to employee classification. Cheryl also assists employers in their liability prevention efforts by conducting employee training, preparing handbooks and implementing policies, as well as conducting wage and hour and pay equity audits.

With the patchwork of emerging state and local pay equity laws, Cheryl has been dedicating significant time to the legal issues surrounding pay equality, state pay equity legislation and litigation and pay equity compliance audits.  She is a frequent presenter on pay equity both locally and nationally.


Speakers Performance Based On Past Webinar Survey Results

Average rating

4.2 / 5

This speaker has received a total of 12 survey responses. Attendees have given an average rating of 4.2 stars out of a possible 5, reflecting on the speakers performance on the following questions.

Overall, how satisfied were you with this presenter?
4.7 Stars
How closely did the presenter follow the schedule?
3.5 Stars

Reviews From Past Webinar Surveys

Our webinars are crafted to deliver exceptional value and insight to business professionals. To ensure we meet and exceed your expectations, we conduct thorough post live webinar surveys. Below, you'll find genuine feedback from attendees, sharing their thoughts on the speaker's performance. These reviews highlight our commitment to continuous improvement and excellence in providing top-tier educational experiences.

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
3.5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
2 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
3.5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
2 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
3.5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
2 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
5 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
3 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
4 Stars
Follow Schedule:
2 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
4.5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
4 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
It would be great to have some time to allow for more questions

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
5 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
5 Stars
Follow Schedule:
5 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
I did have one question that was not covered. When discussing the importance of justification for a difference in pay should there also not be consideration for the amount of the difference. The amount of the difference in pay could negate the justification because it is not in line with a reasonable difference. Any thoughts about that? Thanks, Lorraine Forcinito

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
3.5 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
4 Stars
Follow Schedule:
3 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
Presentation provided a good overview of the state and federal laws. I wish to have seen more case scenarios to help us see how the laws were interpreted. 1.5 hours would work better for me with the first 1 on what was presented and the 0.5 with reviewing cases. Thank you!

Aurora R.
March 5, 2019
3 / 5
Satisfaction Rating:
4 Stars
Follow Schedule:
2 Stars
Do you have any other comments, questions or concerns?
no comment
viewing 1 to 10 of 12

My Testimonials