Question 1

What are the scope and requirements of IRS Circular 230 for tax practitioners?

Accepted Answer

IRS Circular 230 governs all individuals who practice before the Internal Revenue Service, including CPAs, attorneys, enrolled agents, enrolled actuaries, and other authorized representatives. 'Practice before the IRS' is defined broadly—it includes preparing and filing documents, communicating with the IRS on behalf of taxpayers, and representing taxpayers in examinations, appeals, and collection proceedings. Circular 230 imposes a range of affirmative duties: due diligence in preparing returns and positions, competence to handle the matters undertaken, prompt handling of client matters, proper maintenance of client records, and compliance with IRS information requests. Practitioners must avoid conflicts of interest that could impair their independent judgment, and they must obtain informed consent before representing multiple clients with potentially adverse interests. The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) enforces Circular 230 and can discipline practitioners through censure, suspension, or disbarment from practice before the IRS. Tax practitioners should be familiar with the full scope of Circular 230 obligations, as violations can result in personal sanctions and malpractice exposure.

Question 2

What should a tax practitioner do when they discover an error on a client's previously filed return?

Accepted Answer

Discovering an error on a client's previously filed return creates a professional and ethical obligation that must be handled carefully under both Circular 230 and the AICPA Statements on Standards for Tax Services (SSTS). Under Circular 230, a practitioner who learns of an error or omission on a return must promptly advise the client of the error, the legal consequences, and the importance of correcting it—but is not required to notify the IRS directly without the client's authorization. The AICPA SSTS similarly requires practitioners to inform clients of errors and recommend corrective action. If a client refuses to correct a significant error, the practitioner must consider whether continuing the engagement is ethically permissible—in some circumstances, withdrawal may be required to avoid complicity in an ongoing misrepresentation. The practitioner cannot simply prepare a subsequent year's return as if the error did not exist. Where the error may constitute fraud or intentional misrepresentation, the ethical and legal stakes are heightened significantly. Practitioners should document all communications about the error and their advice to the client, both to fulfill their professional obligations and to protect themselves from malpractice claims.

Question 3

What are the AICPA Statements on Standards for Tax Services (SSTS)?

Accepted Answer

The AICPA Statements on Standards for Tax Services (SSTS) are the enforceable ethical standards that govern CPAs in their tax practice, supplementing the requirements of IRS Circular 230 with professional standards specific to the accounting profession. There are currently seven SSTS standards. SSTS No. 1 addresses tax return positions—requiring that CPAs have a reasonable basis for positions taken on returns and disclose positions that may require disclosure under tax law. SSTS No. 2 covers answers to questions on tax returns, requiring complete and accurate responses. SSTS No. 3 addresses certain procedural aspects of preparing returns, including reliance on client-provided information. SSTS No. 4 deals with use of estimates when exact data is unavailable. SSTS No. 5 addresses departure from a position taken in a prior year where the prior position was in error. SSTS No. 6 governs knowledge of a client's error—requiring prompt notification and recommendation of corrective action. SSTS No. 7 addresses the form and content of tax advice provided to clients. Together, the SSTS establish the professional standard of care by which CPA tax practice is measured and against which malpractice claims are evaluated.

Question 4

What information security requirements apply to tax practitioners handling client data?

Accepted Answer

Tax practitioners who handle sensitive client tax data have significant information security obligations under the FTC Safeguards Rule, IRS requirements, and professional ethics standards. The FTC Safeguards Rule—which applies to tax preparers as 'financial institutions' under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act—requires covered firms to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program (WISP) that protects client information. Key requirements include conducting a risk assessment to identify threats to client data, implementing physical, technical, and administrative safeguards proportionate to the risks identified, designating a qualified individual to oversee the program, and testing and monitoring the effectiveness of controls regularly. IRS Publication 4557 provides additional guidance on protecting taxpayer data. Specific security controls required by the Safeguards Rule include access controls, encryption of data in transit and at rest, multi-factor authentication, audit logs, and incident response planning. Data breaches involving client tax information may also trigger notification obligations under applicable state breach notification laws. Practitioners who fail to implement adequate safeguards face regulatory penalties, client liability, and reputational damage that far exceeds the cost of compliance.

Question 5

What is the difference between tax confidentiality and tax privilege under Section 7525?

Accepted Answer

The distinction between tax confidentiality and tax privilege is an important but frequently misunderstood aspect of tax practice ethics. Confidentiality in the tax context refers to the practitioner's professional and contractual obligation not to disclose client information without authorization—an obligation arising from the engagement agreement, the AICPA Code of Ethics, and in some cases state law. This obligation is broad but not absolute, and it does not necessarily protect communications from compelled disclosure in legal proceedings. Tax privilege under IRC Section 7525(a) provides a limited statutory privilege for federally authorized tax practitioners (FATPs)—defined as non-attorney practitioners authorized to practice before the IRS—that parallels attorney-client privilege for tax advice matters. However, the Section 7525 privilege is significantly narrower than attorney-client privilege: it applies only to tax advice in non-criminal proceedings before federal courts or the IRS, it does not apply to criminal tax investigations, and it does not protect tax shelter advice. Practitioners who advise clients that all tax communications are protected by privilege equivalent to attorney-client privilege are providing incorrect guidance that could expose clients to compelled disclosure of communications they believed were protected.

Ethics in Tax Practice

Purchase Options

Recorded Webinar Only

All Access Membership

Chuck Borek

ATATX Credit

CPE Credit

Frequently Asked Questions